The Return of Pro-Life Terrorism, continued

2009 May 31

This is hardly an original point, but this isn’t the first time an abortion provider has been killed by right-wing  domestic terrorists.  Wikipedia has the details:

According to statistics gathered by the National Abortion Federation (NAF), an organization of abortion providers, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers.

In the United States, anti-abortion violence has claimed seven lives (including that of Dr. Tiller) since 1993. As you can probably imagine, most instances of anti-abortion terrorism involve arsons and bombings.  Between 1976 and 2009, the NAF recorded well over 300 cases of bombing and arson against abortion providers, costing clinics millions of dollars of property damage, and causing dozens of injuries and a few lost lives.  In fact, this only touches the tip of the iceberg – there have been over 6000 incidents of violence or intimidation against abortion clinics. Here is the NAF’s list:

  • 7 cases of murder
  • 17 attempted murders
  • 390 invasions
  • 1400 cases of vandalism
  • 1993 cases of trespassing
  • 100 butryic acid attacks
  • 659 anthrax threats
  • 179 cases of assault and battery
  • 406 death threats
  • 4 cases of kidnapping
  • 151 cases of burglary
  • 525 cases of stalking

It’s worth noting that this is an incredibly effective form of terrorism.  As Matt Yglesias explains:

Every time you murder a doctor, you create a disincentive for other medical professionals to provide these services. What’s more, you create a need for additional security at facilities around the country. In addition, the anti-abortion protestors who frequently gather near clinics are made to seem much more intimidating by the fact that the occurrence of these sorts of acts of violence.

In a sane political environment, this is the kind of thing would demand the attention of liberals and conservatives; political violence has no place in a democratic society, and we’re all obligated to speak out against it when it occurs.  Unfortunately, conservatives don’t seem particularly interested in clamping down on anti-abortion terrorism.  During the Bush administration, domestic terrorism expert Dave Neiwert devoted a considerable amount of time to investigating the administration’s unwillingness to devote considerable resources to monitoring right-wing extremists.  More recently is the Republican freak out over revelations that the Department of Homeland Security was monitoring said extremists, leading department head Janet Napolitano to withdraw the bulletin in order to avoid further criticism.

In short, while we can expect Republicans to offer condolences to the Tiller family and condemn pro-life extremists, I doubt that we will see any real cooperation on efforts to actually monitor and preempt domestic terrorists, judging from past behavior.  The simple fact is that hard-right extremists are a non-negligible part of the Republican base, which – unfortunately – makes a fair number of Republicans unwilling to take substantive, affirmative measures towards stopping this violence.

7 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 May 31

    A shame.

    I am a political conservative (a libertarian with a lower-case l actually), and I am a committed Christian.

    This kind of thing flies in the face of everything I believe in; and I hate that people on the ‘conservative’ side of things will project a face of concern but in reality are probably grateful. They disgust me.

    No matter what the man’s views or actions were, vigilante justice should be punished to fullest extent of the law. And the fact that people in the Republican party feel they need to tiptoe around groups who look approvingly on these groups of terrorists drives me crazy.

  2. 2009 May 31

    I don’t know any groups “who look approvingly on these groups of terrorists.” There are, neverthelesss, plenty of political ambulance chasers on the far Left who will equate one act of lunacy the sincerely-held beliefs of Pro-Lifers. Of course, we don’t even know yet whether this murder was so motivated, so it’s appalling, if not surprising, that you already are attempting to do so.

    And no Administration whose head socialized with a leader of the Weatherman has any legitimacy on this point.

    • 2009 June 1
      Charles Schirra permalink

      “However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence,” Obama said in a statement issued by the White House. (CNN)

      Obama’s response seems much more appropriate than one from an Anti Abortion group:

      “We grieve for him that he did not have time to properly prepare his soul to face God,” Terry (Operation Rescue founder) said in a written statement. (CNN)

  3. 2009 June 1
    Thomas permalink

    James Young is still making me laugh.

  4. 2009 June 1

    I don’t know any groups “who look approvingly on these groups of terrorists.

    Really? Here you go, then:

    Here’s a handy list of eliminationist rhetoric coming from all sorts of right-wingers, from very prominent/mainstream to less well-known.

    Here’s a manual from the Army of God that describes – no, praises and encourages – various violent acts such as bombing clinics.

    Here’s a link to “The Nuremberg Files,” which recruits people to harass women’s health clinic workers and patients by filming them not only at the clinics, but in their daily lives. They also want whatever personal information that can be obtained so that they may publish it and “share copies of the pertinent information with local or national pro-life organizations which may need it in their work.” Not so bad, I suppose, except for their page which lists “Aborted and Nearly Aborted Abortionists.”

    So, James, what mental and rhetorical gymnastics will you use to dismiss all of this – which I found in less than 10 minutes of Googling?

  5. 2009 June 1

    I posted a comment in reply to James Young’s predictable nonsense, but it appears to have been eaten. I’d like to be able to get it posted, because I’m sure many of us know people, both online and IRL, that will retreat to such a position, and the comment had links to evidence of how common it is for the right-wing to use violent rhetoric.

  6. 2009 June 2
    thecomedychick permalink

    WWJD… Who Would Jesus Destroy? Nothing warms the cockles of an atheist’s heart more than killing in the name of Jesus. The “pro-life” movement has been primarily run by Christian hate groups who use Jesus and Biblical scriptures to justify hate, discrimination, violence, terror, ignorance, destruction and fear.

    They are going to get more violent as they deal with the reality that they lost the White House, Congress and majority of Americans are NOT on their side.

    Their panties are really going to get in a bunch after the 2010 census, when they realize that of the five major ethnic groups (White, Black, Asian, Native American, Hispanic) Whites are projected to be the slowest-growing group 1995 to 2025; and Hispanic will account for 44 percent of the growth in the Nation’s population. I think they will probably re-focus and start bombing Taco Bells by then.

    Jamelle, I love your blog!

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS